By Taibat Ummi Yakubu

What began as a political disagreement over how best to mobilise support for President Bola Tinubu’s 2027 re-election has quickly turned into an unusually public confrontation between one of the president’s most outspoken ministers, Nyesom Wike, and governors elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The dispute came into the open after the Progressive Governors Forum (PGF), chaired by Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma, met behind closed doors in Abuja on September 14 and declared that APC governors would not participate in, support or endorse any political alliance capable of weakening the party, affecting its candidates or undermining Tinubu’s re-election bid. The governors said their campaign structure would remain focused on official APC candidates.

The statement was widely understood as a rejection of the political arrangement being promoted by Wike under the name “Rainbow Coalition”, a cross-party platform he says is designed to mobilise support for Tinubu beyond the APC’s formal structure.

Wike’s response was swift and unusually blunt.

Speaking on Arise Television, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory insisted that he had never approached the APC governors seeking an alliance with them. He argued that the coalition was not an APC structure and that his political commitment was to Tinubu’s re-election, rather than to determining which political parties should contest other positions in 2027.

“There is nothing that I do that I don’t tell Mr President,” Wike said, adding that he was “not answerable to APC governors.”

He also described the governors as “politically lazy”, arguing that they should concentrate on their own political responsibilities instead of using the president as a reason to oppose his activities.

That exchange has exposed a deeper question within Tinubu’s political camp: where does support for the president end and loyalty to the ruling party begin?

For the APC governors, the distinction appears straightforward. Their position is that supporting Tinubu’s presidential bid cannot be separated from protecting the party’s candidates at the governorship, National Assembly and state assembly levels. Uzodimma said the forum would not support an arrangement that creates divided loyalty or adversely affects APC candidates.

Wike, however, has drawn a different line. He has repeatedly argued that the Rainbow Coalition is specifically intended to build support for Tinubu across party lines and is not an attempt to weaken the APC.

That distinction becomes particularly significant because Wike remains a member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), despite serving as FCT minister in the APC-led Federal Government. His political activities therefore operate in an unusual space: he is a prominent member of the opposition party while simultaneously serving in Tinubu’s administration and publicly campaigning for the president’s re-election.

The disagreement is also touching on the practical realities of elections. Governors control significant political structures within their states, including party organisations and grassroots networks. Wike, meanwhile, is seeking to build a wider coalition that brings politicians and supporters from outside the APC into Tinubu’s presidential camp.

That is where the interests of the two sides begin to collide.

The governors have argued that an alliance involving politicians from other parties could produce competing candidates against APC candidates in state and legislative elections, creating the very divided loyalties they say they want to avoid. Wike, on the other hand, has made clear that supporting Tinubu does not amount to an undertaking that opposition parties will not field candidates against APC candidates in other contests.

Advertisement

The disagreement has already attracted reactions beyond the governors themselves. APC leaders in the South-East subsequently backed the PGF’s position and rejected what they described as the Rainbow Coalition, signalling that the dispute is no longer confined to the personal relationship between Wike and individual governors.

Wike’s relationship with some of the governors has also added another layer to the confrontation. Reports have linked the current tension to earlier disagreements surrounding his appointment as FCT minister, particularly among political figures who already had established influence within Tinubu’s coalition.

Wike himself has suggested that opposition to his political activities did not begin with the Rainbow Coalition. During his Arise Television appearance, he argued that some of the governors had been unhappy with his appointment to the FCT ministry from the outset.

There is also a historical dimension to the controversy. Wike played a prominent role in the G5 governors’ revolt within the PDP ahead of the 2023 presidential election, when the group refused to support the party’s presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar. The political consequences of that episode remain part of the conversation surrounding Wike’s current role, with supporters and critics offering different interpretations of the influence his cross-party manoeuvring could have on another presidential contest.

For Tinubu, the dispute presents a political management challenge. The president has not publicly announced a position taking either side in the disagreement. Wike has nevertheless repeatedly said that Tinubu is aware of his political activities and the Rainbow Coalition.

The issue has become sufficiently prominent that members of the APC Presidential Campaign Council have called for presidential intervention. Ima Niboro, a spokesman for the council, described the dispute as an internal disagreement between political allies pursuing the same electoral objective and urged Tinubu to use his experience to resolve it.

The stakes are not limited to personalities. At the centre of the disagreement is the question of how Tinubu’s 2027 campaign should be organised: through the established structures of the APC, through broader cross-party alliances, or through some combination of both.

The governors are insisting on party structure. Wike is championing a broader political network that he says can bring additional support to the president. Neither position automatically resolves the other.

The dispute has therefore moved beyond the question of whether Wike’s Rainbow Coalition exists. It now raises a more fundamental political question about how a sitting president seeking re-election manages two parallel sources of mobilisation—one controlled by his governing party and another being developed across party lines.

Wike has continued to insist that the coalition is not designed to undermine the APC. In a statement on September 21, he again said securing Tinubu’s re-election remained his major political priority and rejected claims that the coalition was created to destabilise existing political parties.

The governors, however, have made their own position equally clear: their political campaign machinery will support APC candidates and resist arrangements they believe could weaken the party.

For now, the disagreement remains a contest of political structures, loyalties and strategy rather than a formal break between Tinubu and either camp. But with the 2027 election approaching, the increasingly public exchange between Wike and the APC governors has transformed what might once have been an internal disagreement into one of the most visible political tensions surrounding the president’s re-election effort.

How Tinubu eventually manages the competing interests may determine whether the Rainbow Coalition becomes an additional layer of support for his campaign or remains a source of friction within the broader political machinery preparing for 2027.