A fresh legal battle is brewing ahead of the 2027 presidential election as a group of lawyers under the Obidient Lawyers Forum has taken President Bola Tinubu, Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo, and four top government officials to court over what they describe as threats to the life and safety of former Anambra State Governor and Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

The suit, filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja by Kingdom Okere and Joseph Ameh on behalf of the Obidient Lawyers Forum and the Incorporated Trustees of Rights for All International, seeks far-reaching orders compelling the Federal Government and security agencies to provide maximum security protection for Obi and all other presidential candidates ahead of the 2027 elections.

The legal action follows recent remarks attributed to Obi during a live podcast, where he reportedly expressed fears that he "may not be alive to contest next year's presidential election." The plaintiffs also referenced comments allegedly made by Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo, warning Obi against entering Edo State without his permission and suggesting that the former Labour Party presidential candidate's safety could not be guaranteed in the state.

According to court documents, the applicants argued that Obi's constitutional right to life, freedom of movement, and participation in lawful political activities must be protected at all times.

They maintained that every Nigerian citizen, regardless of political affiliation, has the right to move freely across the country's 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory without intimidation, threats, harassment, or fear of violence.

The lawyers further told the court that the repeated threats allegedly directed at Obi have subjected him to significant psychological trauma and emotional distress, thereby undermining his constitutionally guaranteed rights.

In the affidavit supporting the suit, the applicants insisted that no individual, state authority, or government institution possesses the legal power to prevent any Nigerian from entering or leaving any part of the country to conduct lawful activities.

They described the alleged warning by Governor Okpebholo as unconstitutional, unlawful, and inconsistent with democratic principles.

"The threats by the Edo State Governor that Peter Obi's life and security are not guaranteed in Edo State and that he should not enter the state without clearance are not supported by any law. Such statements are anti-democratic, illegal, and amount to executive excesses," the applicants argued.

Advertisement

Among the reliefs sought, the plaintiffs want the court to declare that Obi must not be subjected to politically motivated threats, intimidation, harassment, victimisation, or any form of coercion because of his political beliefs, ethnicity, religion, or any other reason.

They are also asking the court to affirm that President Tinubu, as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, has a constitutional responsibility to ensure the protection of lives and property across the country and to direct security agencies to provide adequate protection for all presidential candidates.

Specifically, the applicants are seeking an order compelling the President to instruct the Nigeria Police Force, the Department of State Services (DSS), the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), and other security agencies to provide what they termed "maximum security protection and intelligence" for Obi and other contestants in the 2027 presidential race.

The suit also requests a direct order compelling the Police, DSS, and NSCDC to immediately deploy security personnel and intelligence assets to safeguard Obi.

Named as respondents in the suit are President Tinubu, the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Inspector-General of Police, the Director-General of the DSS, the Commandant-General of the NSCDC, and Governor Monday Okpebholo.

The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1648/2026 and filed on July 27, is yet to be assigned a hearing date.

The development adds another layer of political tension to the already heated build-up to the 2027 general elections, with debates over political freedoms, security, and democratic participation increasingly taking centre stage.